Edwards Law

EB-2 NIW Business Plan Mistakes: How to Avoid Denial

A bad business plan can completely undermine or destroy your EB-2 NIW case. Today, I am going to discuss how an entrepreneur seeking an EB-2 NIW filed a bad business plan with his case and what you can do to avoid making the same mistake.

As a cross-border immigration lawyer based in Windsor, Ontario and serving clients in the Detroit, Michigan area, I’ve helped numerous entrepreneurs navigate the EB-2 NIW process. Understanding what USCIS looks for in a business plan is critical to your success.

Proposed Endeavor and Business Plan

An entrepreneur who aimed to be a CEO of a dental clinic services company filed an EB-2 NIW petition. His proposed endeavor was “to operate a dental clinic services company in Florida to provide orthodontic and dental consultations and diagnostic services…” along with other related services.(1) The objective of his company was to “provid[e] affordable dental services and treatments for adults and children, as well as provid[e] continued education for dental professionals.”

As far as his business plan was concerned, he submitted a five-year business plan with his petition where he stated that he “intended to employ a total of 87 direct employees and contractors, which he claimed would result in the creation of 118 indirect jobs.” (2)

However, a Request for Evidence (an “RFE”) was issued in the case. The Petitioner revised his business plan based on consultation with a professor of business and economics to address the Director’s concerns and submitted it with the RFE response. In his updated business plan, he stated that he planned “to open his dental clinics both in Florida and Arizona in cities identified as historically underutilized business zones (HUBZones) by the U.S. Small Business Administration.”(3) Also, he revised some of his calculations.

He was ultimately denied and appealed to the Administrative Appeals Office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“AAO”) who ultimately dismissed the appeal. So what did they say?

The AAO Decision

The AAO discussed many aspects of his case. For the purposes of this article, I will focus solely on the business plan requirements for EB-2 NIW.

The AAO criticized the Petitioner’s business plan for the following reasons:

1. Inconsistent Employment and Financial Projections

The revised business plan had different employment and financial projects than the original business plan. Specifically,

Initially, the Petitioner indicated that, by its fifth year of operation, his company would employ a total of 84 employees, resulting in an annual payroll expense of $4,331,385, and he indicated that in that same time, the company would generate an annual revenue of $21,240,000. The Petitioner asserted that his operations would also result in 118 indirect jobs created in the communities where he operates. Then, in his updated business plan, he indicated that he intended to employ a total of 36 employees, resulting in an annual payroll of $2,774,220 and the creation of 51 indirect jobs. Additionally, the updated business plan projected the company’s annual revenue to reach $5,848,763 by its fifth year. (4)

2. Lack of Basis for Projections

The revised business plan did not provide a basis for the initial or revised projections. Also, he did not explain why these projections were changed from the original plan.

3. Failure to Establish National Importance

Lastly, and most fatal to his petition, as the AAO stated:

[E]ven if the endeavor’s revenue and job creation projections were sufficiently explained and supported, they do not establish that his company would operate on a scale rising to the level of national importance contemplated in Dhanasar, nor has the Petitioner explained how his proposed employment numbers and revenue would impact his company’s areas of intended operations. (5)

In other words, even if he had the best business plan in the world, drafted by business geniuses and there was no question about its accuracy in calculating the figures and the goals of the business plan were attainable, the Petitioner did not establish the national importance requirement; therefore, his petition was destined to fail.

Critical EB-2 NIW Business Plan Mistakes to Avoid

So what are the takeaways from this AAO decision?

1. Make Sure Your Business Plan is Accurate Before Filing

If an RFE is submitted and a revised plan is submitted, it looks suspicious and self-serving. Why would the figures be different after the RFE is submitted? The USCIS officer may think you are saying whatever you need to say to get an approval.

Best practice: Have your business plan thoroughly reviewed by experts before initial filing.

2. Provide a Clear Basis for Your Numbers and Projections

USCIS wants to know how you arrived at your numbers. Your EB-2 NIW business plan should include:

  • Market research supporting revenue projections
  • Industry benchmarks for employment growth
  • Detailed financial assumptions
  • Realistic timeline for achieving projections
  • Documentation supporting indirect job creation calculations

3. Involve Experts Early On

Have credible experts help create your business plan from the start. It looks better to have professionals involved as opposed to you creating your own plan. It seems that the Petitioner in this case involved an expert only after an RFE was issued. However, by that point, it was too late.

Recommended experts:

  • Business plan consultants with EB-2 NIW experience
  • Industry experts in your field
  • Economists who can validate job creation claims
  • Financial advisors for revenue projections

4. Use Your Business Plan to Show National Importance

While having a viable business is important, the government wants to see that your proposed endeavor reaches the level of national importance under the Dhanasar standard. Your business plan needs to be crafted with this objective in mind and clearly explain how you plan to obtain this.

Your EB-2 NIW business plan should demonstrate:

  • Substantial merit in your proposed endeavor
  • National importance (not just local or regional impact)
  • How you are well-positioned to advance the endeavor
  • Why it would benefit the United States to waive the labor certification requirement

What USCIS Looks for in EB-2 NIW Business Plans

Based on this AAO decision and the Dhanasar framework, your business plan must address:

Prong 1: Substantial Merit and National Importance

  • How your endeavor has substantial merit
  • Why it is nationally important (not just regionally beneficial)
  • The broader implications of your work

Prong 2: Well-Positioned to Advance the Endeavor

  • Your education, skills, and experience
  • Resources available to you
  • Track record of success

Prong 3: Benefit to the United States

  • Why waiving labor certification serves national interest
  • How your endeavor benefits the U.S. more than requiring employer sponsorship

Contact a Windsor-Detroit Immigration Lawyer for EB-2 NIW Assistance

An EB-2 NIW petition requires careful planning and a well-crafted business plan that demonstrates national importance. The case discussed above shows how even entrepreneurs with viable businesses can be denied if their business plan fails to meet USCIS standards.

As a Canada-U.S. cross-border immigration lawyer, I have experience helping entrepreneurs and professionals with EB-2 NIW petitions, including business plan review and strategy. If you need advice specific to your case, please reach out if you need assistance.

This is not legal advice, just legal information. For case-specific guidance, contact an experienced immigration attorney.


Source Material

In re [Redacted], No. 37116228 (AAO Feb. 24, 2025) (appeal of Texas Service Center decision on Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (National Interest Waiver)), https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/err/B5%20-%20Members%20of%20the%20Professions%20holding%20Advanced%20Degrees%20or%20Aliens%20of%20Exceptional%20Ability/Decisions_Issued_in_2025/FEB242025_02B5203.pdf.

(1) In re 37116228, at 1 (AAO Feb. 24, 2025) (non-precedent)
(2) Id.
(3) Id. at 3
(4) Id. at 5
(5) Id.

Last Updated on February 15, 2026 by Ernest J. Edwards

Translate »
Scroll to Top